In the past few months, the terms “secularism” have been cropping up with an unusual frequency, permeating political debates in India, international events like the Olympics, and everyday conversations. The surge in discussions about secularism has piqued my curiosity, particularly in how it’s applied and perceived in different contexts.

Several instances have captured my attention recently. One notable example is the display of what some perceived as a disrespectful depiction of the Last Supper of Jesus during the opening ceremony of the France Olympics 2024. Additionally, there have been controversial state directives such as displaying names in front of shops to maintain the sanctity of the Kavad Yatra. These controversies highlight how secularism can be viewed through different lenses when it comes to religious sentiments or political gain. Rather than fostering an inclusive and neutral approach, these instances sometimes reflect a misapplication of secularism, which should ideally promote respectful dialogue and governance that encompasses all religious beliefs.

What is Secularism?

When I had researched more I found: Secularism is the principle that advocates for the separation of religion from government institutions and public affairs. At its core, secularism ensures that individuals of all religions, as well as those without religious beliefs, are treated equally by the state. It seeks to maintain a neutral stance in religious matters, ensuring that laws and policies are not influenced by religious doctrines.

Key Aspects of Secularism to me:

• Separation of Religion and State: Governments should not endorse or establish any religion as the official state religion.
• Freedom of Religion: Individuals have the right to follow, change, or reject any religion, and practice their beliefs freely.
• Equality: All citizens should have equal access to public services and opportunities, regardless of their religious beliefs.
• Neutral Governance: Laws and policies are based on reason and public welfare, not religious doctrines.

Kawad Yatra and Debate Over Vendor Transparency

The Kawad Yatra in India is one of the largest religious pilgrimages undertaken by the Hindu community, where devotees travel great distances, sometimes barefoot, to collect holy water from the Ganges during the monsoon season. This journey is deeply rooted in ritual and devotion, with participants adhering strictly to their religious practices, including the food and drink they consume. The request by some state governments for food and eatery vendors to display their full names to ensure adherence to these rituals sparked outrage from opposition political parties, who claimed it undermined secularism.

As a Hindu, I see no issue with buying from vendors of any community; I often share festive sweets and thoughts with vendors from diverse backgrounds, reflecting true secularism. During the Kawad Yatra, many non-Hindu communities contribute by providing essential services to help devotees complete their rituals. My vendors have always been open about their identities, which fosters coexistence. Therefore, I find the opposition’s criticism on this issue perplexing, as transparency about vendor identities seems a reasonable and respectful request.

Drag Queen Act: Not so Secular

France practice secularism through its principle of “Laïcité“. Laïcité principle of secularism established by the 1905 Law on the Separation of the Churches and the State, which mandates the strict separation of religion from government and public life. This principle ensures that the state does not recognize, fund, or influence any religion, thereby maintaining neutrality in public affairs. It encompasses a secular education system where religious symbols are banned in public schools, and public spaces and services remain free from religious influence.

Considering these factors, the depiction of the Last Supper at the Paris Olympics 2024 should not raise concern. However the addition of provocative drag queen displays may have been seen as disrespectful to Christianity. France should exercise caution and focus on the sports and their unifying appeal, rather than pushing the boundaries of secularism in ways that could alienate or offend. It is important for France to demonstrate restraint and avoid projecting an image of being excessively secular, which could have repercussions on its global standing and relationships with diverse cultures and beliefs.

My View: Secularism is a foundational principle that promotes fairness, equality, and rational governance by ensuring the separation of religion from state affairs. It is designed to protect the rights of individuals, including atheists, and ensure that all beliefs are treated with equal respect. As we navigate the evolving discourse on secularism, it is crucial to find a balance that respects both the need for state and the diverse beliefs of individuals. By fostering open dialogue and understanding, we can better appreciate the role of secularism in creating a more inclusive and harmonious society.

#AskDushyant

#Secular #Secularism #Olympics2024 #KawadYatra #ReligiousBelief #State #France